Particular measures are not perfect for our analyses: sensed HIV status of feminine lovers…

Particular measures are not perfect for our analyses: sensed HIV status of feminine lovers…

Certain measures weren’t well suited for our analyses: sensed HIV status of feminine lovers had been just gathered for “main” female partners, and just for the time that is limited.

This limited the salience of response options for men who were polyamorous, including those who might otherwise report having both main male and main female partners because the main MACS survey instrument only allowed participants to choose one“main” partner. Though it measures intimate behavior, the MACS have not calculated intimate identification; because MSMW might not determine as bisexual and because males whom identify as bisexual may not always have sexual intercourse with men and women our results really should not be thought to use particularly to bisexually identified males. As the study that is present a fairly wide timeframe (7 years), MACS individuals whom passed away or dropped away from (or had been censored from) the analysis before 2002, or those that reported intercourse with women and men before 2002 or after 2009 had been excluded from analyses, therefore results may possibly not be representative for the complete MACS cohort from 1983 to provide. In addition, the MACS tool just permits individuals to pick “male” or that is“female assigning sex with their sexual lovers; guys that has transgender lovers could perhaps not categorize them as a result in reporting their intimate actions. Continue reading “Particular measures are not perfect for our analyses: sensed HIV status of feminine lovers…”